_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:54 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Quote:
On February 4, 1912, Austrian-born French tailor Franz Reichelt climbed to the top of the Eiffel Tower in a wingsuit of his own design. The tailor had told French authorities that he planned to test the suit using dummies, but upon his arrival at the tower, he announced that he would make the jump himself. His friends tried to dissuade him, citing wind speed and other factors—including previously unsuccessful attempts with dummies—but Reichelt was not moved. He would not use a safety rope or any other precautions. “I want to try the experiment myself and without trickery, as I intend to prove the worth of my invention,” he told journalists.
Newspapers described the suit as “only a little more voluminous than ordinary clothing” that, when extended, resembled "a sort of cloak fitted with a vast hood of silk." To release the parachute, which had a surface area of 320 square feet and a height of 16 feet, Reichelt merely had to extend his arms out so that his body was in a cross position.
By 8:22 a.m., Reichelt was at the top of the Eiffel Tower. He adjusted the suit, and, facing the Seine, tested the wind direction by tossing a scrap of paper off the edge. Then, he placed one foot on the guardrail, and—observed by 30 journalists, two cinematographers (one up top, and one of the ground), and crowds gathered below—jumped.
Quote:
The parachute folded around Reichelt almost immediately; he plummeted for a few seconds before hitting the ground 187 feet below, leaving a crater 5.9 inches deep. His injuries were gruesome—in its April 1912 issue, Popular Mechanics reported that "his body was a shapeless mass when the police picked it up"—and the tailor was dead by the time onlookers reached him. An autopsy later determined that he died of a heart attack during his fall.
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:48 pm
chris_d
Winston Wolf
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:32 pm Posts: 11364 Location: ruining everything.
Yes/No: No
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Yarr, i miss the Low Quality Inventors thread from tonesettings. Looks like that whole forum has finally gone tetsup.
_________________ STOP FIXING ROCK RECORDS.
START YOUR OWN RELIGION TODAY.
Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:40 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
It's brutal when you see the dude hit the ground, the spray from the impact, even if it's just water from the wet grass. Thankfully for his sake he died on the way down.
This is, I believe, a trap:
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:59 am
El-Todgo
Michael Anthony Fanclub President
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:25 pm Posts: 3201
Re: The Chris Thread
Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:00 am
torgeot
Winston Wolf
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:10 am Posts: 7290 Location: in the valley of the shadow of death
Re: The Chris Thread
The best part of the plummeting fool is his last name is the same as someone I know and they are about equally as bright.
Yes the Inventors thread is sorely missed.
_________________ Member of the Radium Water Gentlemen's League Of Luxury
Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:48 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Cast iron snare drum:
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:26 pm
El-Todgo
Michael Anthony Fanclub President
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:25 pm Posts: 3201
Re: The Chris Thread
Got this spam email earlier
Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:05 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Quality work, this:
Quote:
Princeton's career began tragically with the famous explosion of one of her two twelve-inch guns in 1844, killing the Secretaries of State and the Navy and other dignitaries. The gun was a faulty wrought-iron design in which Captain Robert F. Stockton had tried to economize upon the principles employed by John Ericsson in its sister gun, which had three iron bands sweated around the breech.
Italics mine, save for the ship's name.
I'm not sure whether this counts as invention fail or merely engineering fail. Either way, jolly good show, that. Building a naval cannon which, upon being fired, blows up the head of the Navy takes some skill.
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:29 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
That prompted me to look up the HMS Warrior:
Though the first picture may be her sister ship, HMS Black Prince. These are the first iron-hulled battleships. They do still contain timber, but the hulls themselves are iron, 4.5 inches thick, backed by a foot-and-a-half of teak. I don't know if they can properly be called ironclads as they have metal hulls, not metal-plated wood. Though they are not the first metal ships, they are the first metal warships.
Surprisingly, to me, they could be sailed, like, with sails. Though of course they have steam engines. The Warrior, as evidenced by the lower picture, has been restored and is a museum ship today.
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:55 pm
chris_d
Winston Wolf
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:32 pm Posts: 11364 Location: ruining everything.
Yes/No: No
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Yarr, it was definitely an awkward period of shipdesign there for a while where they had sails and steam props and wood and iron.
Partly it was aboot early steam being less reliable and not-very-efficient, so range was limited by what could fit in the hold, coal-wise.
But probably a bigger part was the fact that navy people didn't 100% trust the propeller/steam tech OR the heavier-than-water hull for kind of an extended period there.
That is just how seafolk are i think. See also: for many years after the magnetic compass was invented, sunstones were still a part of many ships navigation systems.
_________________ STOP FIXING ROCK RECORDS.
START YOUR OWN RELIGION TODAY.
Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:08 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
Now, I'm no expert- it's really only the past year or so I've taken an interest in matters nautical. But awkward sounds correct to me- I couldn't imagine that was very fast or maneuverable under sail. I mean: it's a goddamn battleship. In the modern sense. I don't know its displacement, but I suspect it's a pretty big number compared to other ships of the time.
It never did see combat, which sorta surprises me. And sorta doesn't- the British from the time it was built 'til the time it was decommissioned weren't fighting anyone at sea, and a battleship is useless for whaling on Zulus, say, and you can't sail one up the Khyber Pass. So not so good for what they were on about at the time.
It does seem like an interesting period though; the Warrior was decommissioned in 1883 after already having been taken out of front-line service. It wasn't even 25 years old. The technology had advanced so fast it was obsolete in a decade or so. It's interesting how recognizably modern things got to look after the age of sail. The first HMS Dreadnought, from 1875 (not the famous ship from the early 1900s):
There's still a mast and rigging, but if I didn't know better, I'd say that was an early 20th century ship. Perhaps it's because I never studied this stuff, but it's interesting to me how fast it changed. It makes sense- y'know, the whole Industrial Revolution thing- but ships weren't something I payed attention to.
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:10 am Posts: 7290 Location: in the valley of the shadow of death
Re: The Chris Thread
Seems like the shipbuilders were very wishy washy about "ohh, let's go to steam... but put up these massive masts and sails... just as a backup.." c'mon guys make a decision.
_________________ Member of the Radium Water Gentlemen's League Of Luxury
I bet that cast iron snare would sound incredibly tuned way up with the shit blasted out of it.
_________________ President of the Radium Water Gentlemen's League Of Luxury
Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:42 pm
Snaxocaster
Simethicone
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 11625 Location: McMurdo Research Station
Yes/No: Yes
Less/More: More
Re: The Chris Thread
It's already tuned pretty high in the video. It's not a small snare either IIRC; 6.5x14 if my memory serves. I'm sure it weighs a ton, as it's 1/4" cast iron, and costs a small fortune. It is pretty damn cool. I like that it is an unusual material. I've heard a copper snare- a friend's cousin has/had one- and that was pretty neat too. Alas my tastes were not as developed back then so I can't comment other than it was a good sounding drum. Some dude makes a titanium snare, but the videos I could find of it were lacklustre. I do know and can confirm large brass snares are fantastic.
Of course, were I a drummer, I'd want a cast iron kick drum. A 26". Two of them, actually. To be That Asswhole.
_________________ Member Of The Radium Water Gentleman's League Of Luxury.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum